Australiana 101: The Political Landscape
Landscape.
Australia has a lot of it and, in recognition of this, is also known to
Australians as the Big Country. Okay, it may look smallish on a world map but,
in defence of this particular soubriquet, it is the only country to occupy an
entire continent and it’s about the same size as the US mainland so we reckon
it’s a fair enough description. It is a landscape that is geologically,
geographically, historically and socially abundant – though, in terms of
politics, it isn’t as richly dense as, say, the UK or US political scenery.
However, it is rich in its own unique way.
The reasons
for this lie in the fundamental differences between Australia and those
afore-mentioned countries. Firstly, we have compulsory voting. Secondly, we
have a devil-may-care attitude, summed up neatly in the popular sayings:
“she’ll be right, mate” and “no worries” (or, if you really feel the need for
passionate emphasis, “no wucking furries”). It’s an attitude of casual
indifference that pervades our approach to politics, particularly when the
system is working fairly well as was the case in the first half of 2011 in the
lead up to a federal election.
To give them
their due, the Australian news media did their best to whip up some interest in
the election but they were pushing manure up hill, as the saying very nearly
goes. Predictably, they commissioned various polls which, unlike those
countries with voluntary voting, was guaranteed to at least canvass actual
voters. The media were excited by the results which indicated that the election
would be a close one and subsequently wheeled out various political pundits to
warn of the dire consequences of a hung parliament (in which neither of the two
major political parties win a sufficient majority of seats to claim victory).
This was
possibly the only message that had any effect on the Australian voting public.
In a year, indeed in a country, that lacked political excitement (we haven’t
even had a halfway decent political scandal since the 1970s) a hung parliament
looked just the thing to get the pollies (politicians) jumping and that’s
exactly the result we gave them. It took nearly two weeks for them to sort out
who would govern, during which time the handful of Independents and Green Party
members who held the balance of power in their usually empty hands, had an
absolute ball in the limelight. All (with the possible exception of the
pollies) agreed that a hung parliament was well worth the entertainment value.
Now I doubt
that this result would have happened if we hadn’t had compulsory voting because
it owed so much to the heads-or-tails style of decision-making. It was
statistics at its most sublime random indifference, producing the kind of 50-50
result that you’d expect from multiple tosses of a coin that occasionally lands
on its edge (the ‘edge’ outcome representing that happy handful of Independents
and Greens).
It also
illustrates the need for compulsory voting in this country because, frankly, if
it wasn’t compulsory, too many people just wouldn't bother. Our version of
political founding fathers, that long-bearded and gravely serious group (I’m going
by old photographs here), were obviously aware of this Australian attitude back
in 1900 as they planned for federated independence which took place on the 1st
January 1901. As a side note, they also included suffrage for women at the
outset since women in various colonies had had the vote since the 1880s and
weren’t about to be left out, thank you very much. Besides, in a domestic world
devoid of white goods, who had the time to chain themselves to a fence?
The thinking
that keeps compulsory voting in place falls roughly into two camps which, as
you will see, philosophically converge. There’s the “beastly careless” camp, so
redolent of our national attitude, best illustrated by the following. Every
election, some lone voice in the media rants about the case for voluntary
voting. Since it is evident that they have expended considerable energy in
doing so, counter to the nonchalant apathy which we consider to be the only
justifiable case for voluntary voting, they are summarily ignored.
The alternate
argument is much stronger: no right exists independent of its accompanying
responsibility which in this case translates as: “if you don’t exercise a
right, you effectively surrender that right and we’re not about to give up any
rights!” It’s an irony in our national psyche that, while we are generally very
casual, we are also indefatigable in our determination never to surrender. It’s
a battle-field attitude most obvious in the sporting arena – but that’s a whole
other article.
Compulsory
voting also protects our right to vote in that every effort is made to ensure
that it’s not only possible for all but also easy (fitting in nicely with our
national attitude). Voting is always on a Saturday, starts early and finishes
late, with booths located in schools, church halls and other venues within easy
reach of locals. There’s also early voting by mail or in person and absentee
voting for those who happen to find themselves out of their electorate on the
day. No ID is required and I cannot recall a single case of voter fraud during
my lifetime (that’s not to say there hasn’t been, just that I can’t recall any
and just one case would be big news here).
So that’s
pretty much it. If you were expecting a dissertation on the differences between
our various political parties and the pros and cons of policies, I hope you’re
not too disappointed. I will say that we’ve had universal health care in place
for some decades now and we like it – it's about "looking after your
mates", as the Australian saying goes, and it just makes life that much
easier and fairer - we’re all for that. It’s supported by both ends of the
political spectrum and by the vast majority of us who are not about to
relinquish any right, especially one that works so well and so conspicuously and positively
represents the public good for all.
With a minimum
of intervention on our behalf, it all works and works so well that we heartily
recommend our political system to everyone; that is, we would if it didn’t
involve a vigorous expenditure of passionate energy – we’re saving that for the
sport this weekend. Go Australia!